Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 15:03:48 01/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2004 at 17:25:21, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On January 23, 2004 at 12:02:42, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >Hi Thomas, > >>you write that nonsense all the time -> maybe you READ your forum ? > >http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/24801.htm > >Best >Frank > Message from link above: "Hi Frank, Axon Bench has Geniss Axon XP chess engine, totaly written in machine language. It is mixture of 16-bit and 32-bit instructions. So, we could say that Athlon processors are more optimized for that kind of code compared with Intel machines. The test proves that for computer chess AMD machines are the best choise. PIV-s are simply over-optymized only for CLEAR 32-bit code. It is interesting fact that huge number of chess engines (with exception of Fritz) runs much better on AMD processors ! regards, Vladan" This is a little different than saying it is optimized for AMD. It's a fine line perhaps. Saying Axon is optimized for AMD would be like saying all chess engines are optimized for AMD because they simply run faster on those CPUs. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.