Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 18:09:53 01/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2004 at 20:54:33, Peter Berger wrote: >On January 23, 2004 at 20:37:56, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>It seems, however, that it was quite impacting upon you. Take any version of >>Hiarcs you want, remove the book and run a small tournament vs. Bringer to cure >>that problem. > > >When it is about what I posted, I think it stands on its own, even with the >changes you introduced to it. > >When it is about this statement of yours, you can't be discussing with me , so >it is hard to adress your points ( whatever they might be). Will Hiarcs win a >match against Bringer when Hiarcs uses no book at all and Bringer uses whatever >Grail-like book ? Sure - Hiarcs is _much_ stronger, as everyone knows. > >Does this mean Bringer cheats whenever it wins one from Hiarcs, by stealing the >work/opening book from professionals ? I think this is the point where you >definitely get unreal. I never mentioned anything of the sort -- nor intended to. Curious, however, why you took it that way without any concrete clarification. Anyway, enough said since even after I attempt to make my point clearer for the reading impaired and paranoid -- you still seem to misinterpret in a troll-like manner. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.