Author: stuart taylor
Date: 06:26:19 01/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2004 at 03:07:02, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >Hello Stuart, > >what do you want to have? > >a) an intelligent engine, which could navigate itself through any opening phase >b) a stupidly reproducing archive system using huge libraries and databases > >I prefer a), but the status quo seems to relay on b), blocking any progress. > >Reinhard. I'm saying all years that I prefer a) which I hope you understood. I always hoped that no programmer was thinking his engine is worth the upgrade because of an improved opening book alone (or almost alone). If I knew it to be true that Hiarcs is the strongest engine if it had a different opening book, I would get ONLY Hiarcs, even though it is well down the list. I would be quite happy to play against it with NO opening book. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.