Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 07:58:25 02/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2004 at 08:57:54, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 01, 2004 at 04:24:57, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>Just looked at this game. As Hiarcs 9 owner I am somewhat disappointed with that >>game. >> >>[D] r2r2k1/ppq1bppp/2b1pn2/3P4/2B5/P1NQBP2/1PP3PP/R4RK1 w - - 0 14 >> >>Hiarcs blundered with 14.Qe2?? -+ on a pretty fast machine. >>How is that possible? >> >>White shouldn't be much worse after the obvious 14.Rad1. >> >>Michael > >According to the Hiarcs operator, Hiarcs 9 does not play a3? or exd5? It's at least unlikely it would play 12.a3. Score is 0.00 for the position after 12.a3. Of course it plays 13.exd5. Only move > >The tactics behind Qe2 are actually pretty deep. Something like a 14-15 ply >search for Zappa. Hiarcs is relatively slow in spotting the tactics compared to other top programs. Michael > >anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.