Author: Vicente Fernández Herrasti
Date: 05:52:54 12/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 01:53:03, Kai Skibbe wrote: >On December 03, 1998 at 23:26:30, Vicente Fernández wrote: > >>On December 03, 1998 at 19:13:41, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>>I get the impression that because CM6000 is very cheap to buy then people do not >>>consider it to be very strong. >>> >>>Well with the amount of money that the Chessmaster programs pull in, I think >>>that the guy who programs the kings engine would also be pulling in allot of >>>money, and thus would have the resources to make such a strong engine even >>>stronger. >>> >>>CM6000 is marketed for the mass public, and because it does not have an >>>autoplayer and cannot play against other programs unsupervised, that alot of >>>people dismiss CM6K and for that matter the versions before, because of the lack >>>of results against other programs. >>> >>>And I have already started to see that CM6K has been pulling in some very good >>>results in tournaments already, and all I hear, is "what a suprise". Anyone who >>>has been using Chessmaster since CM5000, knows that it is very strong. >>> >>>Well I hope CM6K does beat the other programs if anyone out there will play it >>>manually (too SSDF members), just to shut up people who keep making comments >>>that this cheap software program, which sells more than any other chess program >>>100 times over. Cannot be strong. >>> >>>And to Mindscape, put in a damn autoplayer so you can shut all these people up >>>and kick their sorry butt. >> >>I have manually played 4 games between CM6000 an fritz 5.1, 60-60, on a k62-300 >>with 128 ram. Chessmaster 6000 leads 3 to 1, winning both games with black. >>Using the thinking lines window I can see that chessmaster gets a more accurate >>evaluation of the positions and, most important, "sees" drawbacks and mates >>before Fritz 5 does. Although the number of games played manually doesn´t count >>statistically, I can tell for sure that CM6000 is very, very strong, maybe the >>strongest... who knows? And, I agree with Mr. Cummings: cheap is not weak, and, >>surely, everybody would like to see an autoplayer on the new King version. > >Do you play the games on one computer ? In this case the match is unfair for the >opponent of chessmaster, because cm6000 uses the processor even if you have >played the match with permanent brain of. >Conclusion : No matches with cm6000 on one computer ! > >Best regards >Kai No, Kai, I am talking about two different computers with the same processor and RAM. Vicente
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.