Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:16:57 02/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2004 at 16:14:57, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 05, 2004 at 14:57:32, Bob Durrett wrote: > >> >>Quote from an MSNBC article: >> >>Forty-seven years after IBM unleashed it, Fortran (formula translation), the >>original “high-level” programming language, would seem to be the infotech >>equivalent of cuneiform. But it’s still widely used, especially in scientific >>computing. Why has this Eisenhower-era veteran outlasted so many hardware and >>software generations? “It’s partly the learning curve,” says Hewlett-Packard >>Laboratories’ Hans Boehm, former chair of the Association for Computing >>Research’s special-interest group on programming languages. “For some people >>it’s good enough, and it’s hard to let go of something once you learn it.” >>Adaptability and compatibility, which made Fortran the programmers’ lingua >>franca in the 1960s and ’70s, are also key to its viability. Major upgrades have >>boosted efficiency and added features while preserving old versions intact. So a >>vast number of tried-and-true Fortran 77 programs jibe with the current Fortran >>90. Microsoft, take note. >> >>Maybe chess programmers are missing out on the best language of all! > >For numeric work, Fortran is as good or better than anything else. >The available code base is larger than any other language. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ for numeric work, of course. For business applications (and probably in general) it is COBOL. Most freely available stuff is in C. > >There is a free Fortran 95 compiler that nobody ever seems to hear about. >ftp://ftp.swcp.com/pub/walt/F/
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.