Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 10:23:08 02/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2004 at 13:19:50, Russell Reagan wrote: >On February 06, 2004 at 12:12:18, Slater Wold wrote: > >>Well of course. If you could solve this, you could probably solve chess. >> >>When you do any kind of pruning, it's a trade off. That it will help in more >>cases than it will hurt. >> >>I don't do any kind of pruning or null-move, YET, because of this. I want to >>build my engine around how it evaluates positions, not around what it will never >>see. (To explain better, I want a solid engine, with a good search & eval, and >>doing the things I want/need, and THEN I will try things to speed it up such as >>reductions & null-move, etc.) > >Hi Slate, > >I didn't know you had a program until just recently. How long have you been >working on your program? How is it coming along? Tell us some about it. What >language you're using, whether or not you chose one of the popular board >representations, or whatever. And good luck! This is what happens when you operate a chess program in a tournament. Now that he has been infected by the chess programming virus, it is all over for poor Slate . . . . anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.