Author: Amir Ban
Date: 13:33:43 02/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 18:39:43, Mark Young wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 13:00:42, Uri Blass wrote: > >>At least in the case of kramnik the mistakes that were done are circumstancal >>evidence. > >No it is not circumstancal evidence. Not when one can site many examples of both >GM Kasparov and GM Kramnik making very shallow tactical oversites before and >after their matches with computers. > >It is common to see players blunder like this when playing computers. This is >not just true for GM Kasparov or GM Kramnik. > >The stress of playing a computer is the cause of most of these blunders. It is a >different kind of chess then playing a human. > I would be interested to see what you can show. I was under the impression that the Kramnik and Kasparov blunders (against Fritz) were unique, for them, and for all 2700+ players. Weren't they ? Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.