Author: Janosch Zwerensky
Date: 07:02:34 02/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2004 at 15:23:03, William H Rogers wrote: >There are some pretty strong GO programs already outthere. GnuGo is said to be not much weaker than the top commercials (the strongest of which is Go++), but a weakly 4-kyu amateur like myself can give it a seven-stone handicap and be confident of victory. If I don't try to play the weaknesses of the program at all but treat it just as I would treat a human, then the difference might shrink to four or five stones, but at any rate, beating a "master" is lightyears off given the current state of the art. > (...) Somehow they rate players using a >'stone' method which I really don't understand but the programs are more than >half-way up the stone ladder. They are weaker than the average club player, and by a mile so. Regards, Janosch
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.