Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 11:42:07 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 06:03:18, Daniel Clausen wrote: >After Hydra clearly showed in only 7 games that it's the best chess engine, you >only need one game against it with a chess engine to prove that _another_ chess >engine would crush it. If we'd have the same progress in computer chess engines >as we have in finding out which engine is the strongest, we surely would have an >engine now which would beat DeepBlue2. > >:) > >Sargon > >PS. Yes I saw the IMHO at the end of the post, so don't take this one too >serious. :) I'm glad his opinion is "humble" Everything said in this thread about strength are nothing but speculations and most of them know its just speculations but still continues to speculate claiming the "real" truth... There is just one way to find out: play, play and play. /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.