Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 05:12:32 02/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 20:45:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: >How are you testing? IE when I use intel's compiler, with PGO, the inline is >faster here. Not significantly, but still faster... I used gcc without PGO (was too lazy to do the profile run). I added -DINLINE_ASM to the CFLAGS and removed the asm= for the linux target. First I had removed -DUSE_ASSEMBLY, but that didn't compile, because then the versions in boolean.c would also be compiled. So, I added the DUSE_ASSEMBLY again (and ignored the warning about static declaration follows extern declaration, which IMO does not really matter). I did not use icc, because it says: # -INLINE_ASM Compiles with the Intel assembly code for FirstOne(), # LastOne() and PopCnt(). This is for gcc-style inlining # and thoroughly breaks the Intel C/C++ compiler at the # present (version 8.0). # in the Makefile. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.