Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 17:32:49 02/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2004 at 20:24:27, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On February 18, 2004 at 21:43:44, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On February 18, 2004 at 21:25:14, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On February 18, 2004 at 15:45:09, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>On February 18, 2004 at 14:01:31, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>The reason why Diep did not showed up ay CCT6 was I could not operate Diep >>>>>during that weekend. Vincent could not operate it either. >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps, you are fullful of free time, but I must have a fulltime job in >>>>>Venezuela to get a good salary. >>>> >>>>Oh, well in that case, I completely understand that you can't take off work for >>>>two or three days and spend zero money. Hyatt on the other hand, there is >>>>clearly something wrong with that guy for not taking off two weeks of work and >>>>paying several thousand dollars to participate in a circus. How could I not see >>>>this so clearly before? Thanks Arturo for clearing things up for me. >>> >>>First of all, I dont what you mean of "that guy for not taking off two weeks of >>>work and paying several thousand dollars to participate in a circus". I have not >>>written anything similar to that. Could tell me what are you talking about? >>> >>>Well, you are as bad as concluding things as a Circus Director. Sorry, but you >>>misunderstood everything as always... Well, if you lived in Venezuela or if you >>>read the news around the world, you can understand what I am saying. Living in >>>USA is difficult to understand what the Venezuelan Situation means. >>> >>>Thanks, Russell for your absurd conclusion and to make more confused one single >>>declaration. >> >>We all have the same problem: "Our perceptions are mostly imaginary." I, >>personally, suspect that there is not a single human on this planet who is >>immune to this malady. We all imagine mis-intentions and mis-thoughts which >>mostly are not there at all. >> > >I dont have a problem of perception. It seems to be that I said something that >it was taken as another thing or in a war that it is boring to follow. Using the >"polite" sentences of Hyatt: who cares? Chalk it up to a communication problem. A misunderstanding. That's what it all really is. There is a fine line between humor and "attacking" and sometimes one is intended and the other perceived. > >>Anyway, life's realities do seem to get in the way sometimes. We cannot all go >>to every tournament we would like to go to. But there is plenty of interesting >>data coming out of the tournaments, so that data should keep everybody busy. >> >>Bob D. > >Well, I agree. However, what happened if you drew an imprudent conclusion >without enough data such as "Crafty crushes Hydra" when it has not been seen the >first Match that can prove that? Try to see the humor in outrageous assertions like "Crafty crushes Hydra." No one should take such a sentence seriously. It is obvious intended humor. Anyway, let's drop this thread. It's hardly worth beating a dead horse. Everybody has apologized and that should be enough. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.