Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 08:03:03 02/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2004 at 10:20:06, Russell Reagan wrote: >On February 21, 2004 at 09:45:23, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>What is wrong with supporting Vincent [or anybody else] in a discussion? > >Nothing is wrong with supporting Vincent [or anyone else] in itself, but when >the claim is that Dr. Hyatt doesn't attend WCCCs because he doesn't think he can >win, that's just silly. Yes. In fact, the "silliness" of it is a clue. When someone makes a statement which is, on the face of it, outrageous, rediculous, or silly then no one should take it at face value. I suspect that outrageous statements about Bob Hyatt's intentions were merely to get a reaction from Bob or, at the very least, to rib him a little bit. Apparently it not only worked with Bob but with others as well! : ) Incidentally, Vincent responds sometimes to such prods too! [I hope the moderator doesn't zap me for saying that.] Bob D. >Look what he did with a *mere* quad Opteron in CCT6. >Imagine what he would do with a 64-way Itanium :) > >I assumed, apparently incorrectly, that Arturo was aware of these accusations >against Dr. Hyatt in the past, and that since he is friends with Vincent and has >supported him many times in the past that he was supporting what Vincent was >saying.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.