Author: Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz
Date: 10:18:29 02/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
>Why "always for side to move"?? That makes it (IMHO) more confusing. Most >chess analysis is always with respect to the white side, and many current chess >programs now produce search scores that same way. I don't know if I started the >"+=good for white" revolution, but I've been doing it for a long time and it >makes the output much more understandable... No particular reason. I agree that it's better to understand the eval always for white, and avoid confusions; at least I'm accustomed to it. I guess most of the outputs that people were posting were given to the side to move, and since they starting contributing to all this, I suggested this only to accomodate to them. It's not a big deal anyway, as long as we all know what we're doing. Regards, Jaime
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.