Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 08:12:05 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2004 at 10:16:55, Ricardo Rego wrote: >Hi > >Several messages in the last few days are handling the analysis / evaluation >issues. I believe I am one of the Ruffian's customers that still have doubts >about the 'power' of its game. > >Considering the following positions and the following evals, I got an conclusion >that Ruffian is not a good evaluator. Checkout (and compare) the scores provides >by Ruffian against other engines... Ruffians thinks different. Simple and Plain. > >Ok, the positions have a particular and similar pattern, but I found out the >same thing with other setups... > >R2 > > [D]1rb1n1k1/5r1p/p2p1pp1/3P4/q1P1PQ2/3RN3/P5PP/KN4R1 w - - 0 31 > > >Analysis: 120 seconds >PIII 700 Mhz - 32Mb Hash Tables > >Engine Best Move Relative White Score >---------------------------------------------------- >CM9000 Nd2 0,94 >Shredder 5 Nd2 0,26 >Fritz 7 Nd2 0,31 >SOS 4 Nd2 0,31 >Ruffian 2.10 Nd2 -0,51 ***** > > > [D]1rb1n1k1/1r5p/p2p1p2/2PP2p1/1q2P3/1N1RNQ2/P5PP/K1R5 b - - 0 35 > > >Analysis: 120 seconds >PIII 700 Mhz - 32Mb Hash Tables > >Engine Best Move Relative White Score >---------------------------------------------------- >CM9000 ..Qa3 1.56 >Shredder 5 ..dxc5 0,76 >Fritz 7 ..dxc5 1.16 >SOS 4 ..Qa3 1,10 >Ruffian 2.10 ..dxc5 -0,70 *****
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.