Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: suggestion for a rule for exposing source code in world championship

Author: Anthony Cozzie

Date: 10:55:40 02/27/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 27, 2004 at 13:08:43, Albert Silver wrote:

>On February 27, 2004 at 12:26:56, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>
>>On February 27, 2004 at 08:46:16, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I think that the following rule should be a good rule for world championships.
>>>
>>>Every programmer who participate in the computer world championship has to
>>>expose the source code of the program 5 years after the event.
>>>
>>>It can be good for the following purposes:
>>>
>>>1)Preventing clones and at least clones will be exposed after 5 years.
>>>2)progress in computer chess because people will have access to more
>>>information.
>>>
>>>I suggest 5 years because I believe that if we decide about short time then it
>>>may prevent the participation of commercial programs when in case that the code
>>>is exposed only after 5 years then 5 years is enough time to make a significant
>>>improvement in the program so good programmers can continue to earn money from
>>>selling chess programs and participate in the world championship.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I think that commercial secrets that are kept forever is a bad thing and it is
>>>better to have a world when it is not allowed to have commercial secrets for
>>>more than 5 years.
>>>
>>>commercial secrets for a limited time are needed(otherwise people will have less
>>>motivation to do things) but commercial secrets for unlimited time are bad for
>>>progress because people have less information to learn from.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>I honestly see nothing wrong with the ICGA's actions.
>>
>>1. Assume innocent.
>
>Assume innocent? I was under the impression they assumed guilt and removed List
>5.12 from the roster in mid-tournament.
>
>                                       Albert

No, they offered to fly Dr Heinz to Germany to take a look at List's source.  He
refused, so they kicked him.

anthony

>>
>>2. If evidence comes up, fly senior member to view parts of the source code on a
>>laptop.
>>
>>There is no problem to fix here.  The ICGA handled this dispute very well.  The
>>draw issue was not handled as well, but hitting 50% isn't so bad.
>>
>>anthony



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.