Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 07:14:22 03/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2004 at 09:13:31, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >On March 01, 2004 at 08:29:50, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>I would recomend to make a 2in1 Version. Build an Engine that supports WB AND >>UCI. If you use (or let use) an adapter there will be a point with complains >>about it and if you have a bug you never know if it is the adaptor (maybe not >>your own) or your engine. > >That's why I would like to know how well existing adaptors work. To be honest: I dont know. For every of these WB Engines I would have to figure out again what values are suported, how to set hashsize, where they want to have the tbs, Logfile, Bitbases, Pawnhash, computeropponent, booksettings ... and tomorrow there is a new engine and I have to start again, and again and again. I only use UCI engines (Its allways a right click in my favorite GUI and I see all parameters 4 the engien, I cant imagine an easier way). There is one exception, that is crafty because you cant avoid it as a reference (But if I could I would!!!) Ingo BAuer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.