Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: [MODERATION] This is just an attack.. no proof at all...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 05:37:30 03/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 06, 2004 at 08:16:52, Chessfun wrote:
<snipped>
>Also as I stated I asked three specific questions to you.
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?352067
>
>You still choose to ignore the two other questions on that post.

Not only that it was not posted as question but asking for a or b or c.
It was better to say a and b and c because or means that one of them is enough.


<snipped>
>You simply dance around, ignoring what's been asked and trying to change the
>topic to a personal level. There is no personal level, all I'm asking for is a
>simple reply.
>
>If you don't want to send me the games then simply say it.
>If you don't have the CSTal PGN say it.
>If you have no evidence to reply to the post
>http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=348213
>simply say it.
>
>Instead you choose to simply say things that are nothing to do with anything.
>
>Sarah.

I totally agree and I can add that thorsten said in
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?353136

"if you post data with sensible and senseful time control i do read and i will
not ignore it. i will say "thank you" and study the material"

I saw no thanks in thorsten's reply but only in
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?353141

Sarah:"See, seems I can stick to on topic stuff."

Thorsten:"yes. sometimes. but not always. guess it happens in cycles."

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.