Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:13:06 03/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2004 at 09:44:23, Uri Blass wrote: >It is clear that sarah means to the game with all the depth and times and >evaluation of shredder(see the previous sentence). yes - i meant the same. >the sentence that you did not post the game is not correct but calling it a lie >is wrong because it is clear for the intelligent reader that sarah does not mean >only to the game but also to time and depth. we all 3 mean the same. and only because she cannot find it gives no right to say i never posted it. Or has she alzheimer ? >I do not see when sarah started insulting. >Sarah only responded to a post when you used the word ignorant against her. thats not an insult. its a behaviour. if she ignores the critics and the problems the ssdf has had in the past she is ignorant. >It was a reply to the fact that you used the word ignorant against her. when somebody ignores data, he is ignorant. thats a plein fact. not an insult. >I do not think that it was justified and the word moron is worse than the word >ignorant but she did not start in personal level. of course she did. she did it now and in the thread about vincent. >She means to the game with the depth and times and evaluation of shredder. that was all posted here. >I remember only the pgn output without times and depths. yes. i see that you both remember the data i got from the CSTal machine, but i later got the data from the other machine and posted it.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.