Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:38:30 03/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2004 at 10:35:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 06, 2004 at 10:22:48, Chessfun wrote: > >>On March 06, 2004 at 10:21:13, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2004 at 10:10:33, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On March 06, 2004 at 10:07:15, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>> >>>>>On March 06, 2004 at 09:27:00, Chessfun wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Oh that was some 4 weeks ago and you still haven't had access??? >>>>> >>>>>Of course i had access. When i had access i posted it in this forum. >>>>>Is this too difficult for you to understand sarah ? >>>>> >>>>>>You post a game, someone asks a question about it and you claim should I do this >>>>>>instantly? It was weeks ago, HELLO WAKE UP >>>>> >>>>>I don't have to wake up. You asked 4 weeks ago to post the game. >>>>>And i posted it. Not when you asked for it, but later. >>>>>And now you come and you don't find it and claim lies. >>>>>thats really a fine style sarah. >>>>> >>>>>>You did not post it with what was requested times and depths. >>>>> >>>>>??? >>>>> >>>>>I posted the complete game from shredders point of view, with times, depths etc. >>>> >>>>NO you didn't. >>> >>>There is another possibility that thorsten posted it but for some reason it was >>>deleted so there is no link. >>> >>>I can be only sure that I did not find it and not that he did not post it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Fair enough, but how difficult would it be for him to repost it! >>or answer the other questions I've asked. >> >>I guess just too difficult. >> >>Sarah. > >I did a search for thorsten's name and >I found that he posted it > >http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=347854 > >Uri Thanks Uri I had searched as well but didn't find it. Now 1 out of 3 not bad, or should it be 2 out of 3 isn't bad, anyway settling for one is something. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.