Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 04:32:28 12/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 1998 at 07:24:47, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 08, 1998 at 20:34:30, Micheal Cummings wrote: > > >>>>All my games which I mention for this post were played two minutes for each >>>>side. My settings for CM6K which I have posted here before over 40/2hr time >>>>settings beat the Faber ones, and the Faber ones at that time setting also beat >>>>the CM6K standard settings. but I am talking about 2 minutes a side for these >>>>games. >>> >>>?? So what did you play? 2min/game? 40/2h? How many? Have you tried other >>>opponents than al the CM personalities? >> >> >>The ones that your settings I find lose at is in the two Minute a side games >>against the CM standard settings. > >I can live with that. :-) >2min blitz is much worse than 5min blitz which I also dislike... >I am only interested in tournament games and correspondence analysis. > >>I find that your settings over 40/2hr games your settings win over the standard >>settings. I just was shocked when I wake up in the morning look at the results >>for the 2 minute games to never see your settings win. And I just sit and wonder >>why, your settings will beat the standard settings at anything over 2 minutes. >>But I find they do not win in under two minutes a side games. > >You didn't answer my question: Did you also play other opponents than CM styles? >And longer time controls? That would be much more senseful. Yes I did play against Rebel 10 with your settings and my settings. And they both won the 10 games at 40/2h with a score of 6:4. On equal hardware. One interesting point is that there was no draws for both tournaments for the two setting against Rebel 10. I do not have the games saved either so I cannot post them. I know better now to save these types of games so I can post them in future :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.