Author: Fabien Letouzey
Date: 03:25:28 03/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 06:19:34, Tord Romstad wrote: >On March 15, 2004 at 19:23:45, ERIQ wrote: > >>just wanted to know what others thought. I still like phalanx not because of >>strength but style, but thats just me :) > >If you like Phalanx, you are likely to like Gothmog as well. :-) > >Here are a few of the strongest few engines for Linux, ordered in groups with >similar playing strength (my impressions, I have no ratings): > >Group 1: Deep Sjeng, Ruffian >Group 2: Crafty, Pepito, Yace >Group 3: Amy, Fruit, Gothmog, Gromit, Phalanx >Group 4: Arasan, Beowulf, Butcher, Djinn, Gnuchess, OliThink > >... Just in case, so that you don't lose time looking for it, Fruit is not yet available for linux because it is a UCI-only engine. The only working UCI interface I know of is Jose, which does not handle engine-vs.-engine matches. I am working on a UCI-xboard adapter which I hope to release next week. Porting this adapter to Windows is going to be a major headache though ... Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.