Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 13:07:27 03/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 16, 2004 at 22:23:06, Steven Edwards wrote: >On March 16, 2004 at 21:05:40, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>On March 16, 2004 at 06:32:55, Steven Edwards wrote: > >>>A few points on the 1800 Elo number in the primary goal set: >>> >>>1. The only test suite data we have for Paradise is just under a hundred >>>positions from the first one hundred positions from WAC. I think its >>>performance was somewhat under 2000 Elo because of its time limit of forty-five >>>minutes per move, and that is one reason for the 1800 Elo figure in the primary >>>goal set. >> >>45 minutes on a machine from 20 years ago is about how long, on today's >>hardware? Three seconds. Besides, IIRC, Wilkins only gave it that kind of time >>because it was being interpreted as it ran. Your stuff will be compiled, or at >>least JIT-compiled, won't it? > >Nope. ChessLisp is interpretation only at this point. Okay, in that case you can have the full 3 seconds per move! ;-) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.