Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: About history and aging it

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 02:24:20 03/18/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 17, 2004 at 19:34:41, Steve Maughan wrote:

>Tord,
>
>>Does this mean that you search losing non-captures before losing captures?  Is
>>this really a good idea?
>
>Are you suggesting that you do a SEE for nomal moves to see if the moves puts
>the piece en-prise?

Yes.  I always thought this was the way everybody did it ...

>This approach is outlined in KnightCap (I think) and I tried to do this in
>Monarch at one stage and it didn't seem to work well for me.

Interesting.  I never tried everything else.  Perhaps I should do some
experiments.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.