Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Best Game CI 88 (and start your engines....)

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 07:03:33 03/18/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 18, 2004 at 09:34:48, martin fierz wrote:

>On March 18, 2004 at 05:09:35, Tord Romstad wrote:
>
>>On March 18, 2004 at 00:25:09, martin fierz wrote:
>>
>>>on my machine (P4 1.4GHz) Muse is fastest:
>>
>>... and here, of course (P4 2.4 GHz), Gothmog is fastest.  Rxe6 is found
>>after 7 seconds.  By the way, I agree that Muse seems to be improving
>>very quickly.
>
>thx but....
>
>>Gothmog has had a lot of trouble against it on the ICC
>>lately.
>
>...i see 6-2 for gothmogX in march. am i missing something?

Yes.  As so often, the results don't tell the whole story.  If you take
a look at the games, you will see that Muse could easily have scored more
than 50% in these games.  GothmogX was very lucky.

>of course, you are
>running on better hardware but not that that would explain 6-2....
>i usually get around 15-20 of 40 points in my blitz nunn matches against gothmog
>0.4.5 - i don't know how much better 0.4.6. would be.

I also don't know.  The newer 0.4.7 (released yesterday) is more
thoroughly tested, and seems to be around 50 points stronger than 0.4.5.

>in addition, on ICC you
>have the better hardware + gothmog can probably ponder which muse can't yet. so
>overall it shouldn't really be a contest yet :-(

Yes, Gothmog can ponder.

>of my last N changes (N large), N proved to be useless. so i'm not having the
>feeling that i'm making a lot of progress recently :-(

Like all of us, I guess.

>i should probably take a break and switch to the more mundane tasks of improving
>the opening book and implementing pondering. somehow that's not what i want to
>work on, but it would help.

I can understand that.  Pondering in particular is boring, and I found it
surprisingly difficult to implement and work 100% right.  It must have
taken at least a month or two after my first public release before most
of the ugly pondering-related bugs were fixed.

>another thing i should work on is the trojan sac on g5 (or do some learning...),
>some crazy guy on ICC drained muse during the last days by repeating the same
>game whenever he got a chance.

I think a good king safety eval is a better way to handle this than adding
special code for trojan sacs.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.