Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 04:55:44 12/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 1998 at 06:07:42, Oliver Y. wrote: >On December 11, 1998 at 04:48:05, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On December 11, 1998 at 02:18:41, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:21:11, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On December 10, 1998 at 08:03:27, Harald Faber wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 10, 1998 at 07:50:29, Soren Riis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>If you want women to like chess computers you will probably have to build it >>>>>>so it cries and wet its panties if the opponent (!) plays a weak move. >>>>>>This is probable still to simplistic so you will have to build in a random >>>>>>generator which generates the computers "emotions". Sometimes it does not >>>>>>want to play, sometimes it want to win, sometime get angry if it wins, >>>>>>and most of the time it just want to play scrapple. In short make >>>>>>the programme behave more like a woman ;-) >>>>>>Soren Riis >>>>> >>>>>This will probably work but the plaing strength will suffer. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>>CM6000 is perfect for women, for an angry woman personality you just put the >>>>attacking setting up full. For depressed, just put the defense up full and make >>>>CM accept draws more often, like it does not care if it wins or loses. >>>> >>>>And Most importantly if it is that time of the month, full scale on the >>>>randomness of play setting will make it unpredictable and like a woman. >>>> >>>>There are an endless possibilities to create a personality with CM6000 for a >>>>woman to get along with and share their girl secrets with :-) >>>> >>>>This is great, when my fiance goes away and I cannot play with her. I will just >>>>create her mood and her playing strength with Chessmaster. >>>> >>>>Is there anything this program cannot do :-) (yes I know there is so shut up) >>> >>>If you were a woman, and you read the post above, would you be offended? >>> >>>Did you ask this question to yourself before you posted? >>> >>>My comments could be applied to a number in this thread, I'm not intending to >>>pick on any one person. >>> >>>Dave Gomboc >> >>It is fun, I could make the same personalities for a variety of men as well. > >Counterfactual. You did not in fact do the same for men. Moreover, doing so >would absolve nothing. See below. > >>Well I let my Lady read it, and she laughed, then wacked me on the back of my >>head and called me a prick. > >Both of the above sentences contain the naturalistic fallacy. > >>But she did it with good humour, I hope you are not one of these people who >>stand up for womens ethics. >Inappropriate use of anecdotal evidence. > >>They want to be treated on the same level as a man >>then they have to roll with the harmless jibes. > >Any social psychologist, of any political persuasion, would tell you such jokes >in fact are very harmful. Don't trust me. Ask them. > >>I would not get offended if a woman was to post on here and say something about >>us dumb males. >Incorrect assumption of existing equality and/or equity within society. > >>I posted it because my lady found it funny, not offensive and if >>she did find it offensive I would not have posted it. > >Good to know that your woman's opinion is congruent with the population at large >that Dave is concerned with. > >>:-) Go with the flow of life man. >Again, you've committed the naturalistic fallacy. > >Factual conclusion: some men can be consistently illogical, therefore, they >must engage chess programs in order to resolve this defect. > >Show this post to your wife. Tell us what she calls you after she hits you on >the head again... :-) Good to know at least someone on here understand the female population. I gave up trying to understand them long ago. I did show her this post and she actually thought you were more funny than me. Her comments were "Thats all we need another #$%&@ defending us little old helpless ladies from the mean ol men of this world." I have to agree, you are funny, whether right or wrong, funny. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.