Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 09:26:36 03/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2004 at 11:45:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 23, 2004 at 11:14:18, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On March 23, 2004 at 10:50:21, Peter Fendrich wrote: >> >>>Without really knowing, I think that Goth's real strength is in the search and >>>not that much the evaluation. It can't be that bad of cource but I imagine it's >>>not in the same legue as the search. >> >>It feels weird to talk about the "real strength" of something that is still >>lightyears behind the top engines, but you are definitely right that my search >>is much better than my eval. >> > >How do you compare it? > >Do you feel that Gothmog is relatively stronger in tactics relative to engines >with similiar strength? Yes. My impression is that the games Gothmog wins against opponents of comparable strength are most often decided by the fact that Gothmog searches deeper at some critical moment of the game. When it loses, it usually seems to be because of poor endgame play or horrible misevaluations. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.