Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 18:22:09 03/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 23, 2004 at 14:35:46, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote: > PROBLEM: Qsearch returns a false value, and it is stored in the hash as an >"Exact" value (+0.24). This value fails high (-3.27,-3.25), so a research is >done with a wider windows. But now there is a hash match with +0.24!, so Qsearch >is never called. The result: +0.24. This would have never happened without hash >tables... or with tables but without aspiration. Have you carefully considered whether it is appropriate to store +0.24 into your hash table as an exact value? After all, this score was reached via a quiescence search. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.