Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:09:11 03/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2004 at 08:58:59, Pat King wrote: >On March 27, 2004 at 18:43:59, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>30 measurements are needed for reliable statstical inference. >>You can't even use the T-test or some other estimatrs with less than 30 >>measurements (or you shouldn't because the result is invalid). > >Funny, that's not what your links say. The second one appears to be broken BTW. >> >>See (for instance): >>http://math.usask.ca/~szafron/STATS244_chapter9_notes.pdf >>http://www.stat.colostate.edu/~hess/ST101/Notes/ >> >>Without at least 30 observations, the quality of the computed answer is so low >>as to be nearly useless. >> >>Is it better? Quite likely. How much better? You haven't an inkling yet. > >Nope, nor am I interested. The change is better than the original, time to write >more changes :) Theory says it should be 100 Elo better or more (because of a 3x speedup) and you get 10 Elo. You would not find that interesting?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.