Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why ... egtb format ...

Author: Johan de Koning

Date: 23:13:53 04/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 01, 2004 at 22:30:27, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>I see. So in FEG your have krpkr wtm, krpkr btm, krkrp wtm, and krkrp btm. Than
>yes, you can figure value without the search, at a cost of (probable) extra TB
>probe. Extra probe is unavoidable when the score is a draw.

As Uri pointed out, one can easily avoid these extra probes inside
an alpha-beta search.

But as Theron pointed out some years ago, one should avoid *any*
probe inside a search.

>So your are paying that price, and slower access due to 4x larger block size, to
>achieve ~30% smaller TBs. Reasonable tradeoff, but I would not call it "better"
>:-)

Decompression time is tiny compared to random disk access, and it is
getting tinyer all the time. Hence when we're talking about 20% smaller
(rather then 30% !) it's not a trade-off but simply a small advantage.

When it comes to "better", there is the simple fact that FEG generates
the data [BLEEP]ingly fast. On any machine. Without the need to update
whenever some Pawn is added to whatever side.

Please accept that fact and don't play stupid (or should I say don't
play MicroSoft?). Though my social intelligence is close to retarded,
I can't help sensing friction eversince we met (Maastricht 2002).
I'm trying to ignore it, and letting it be your problem. But as you
can see, sometimes I fail to ignore it. Let's just say Nalimov TBs
are cool and FEG is cool, OK?

>BTW you can achieve better compression in .emd files by replacing all "broken"
>scores by the most common non-broken score in the TB. I always was curious how
>much it will save, but never made the experiment...

Do the experiment and be surpised. Surprised by the fact it doesn't
save much. Surprised by the fact that, given a suitable symbol size,
statistical compression works much better than intuition. Well, we
knew that already. But still it is scary. :-)

... Johan



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.