Author: martin fierz
Date: 07:19:38 04/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2004 at 14:16:22, Artem Pyatakov wrote: >On April 01, 2004 at 13:11:14, Pallav Nawani wrote: > >>Would care to you elaborate a little? What do you mean by the most 'pouplar' >>move or how is your method different than just having 4 killer moves? >> >>Pallav > >Pallav, > >Good to know somebody in this forum still cares about computer chess programming >and little advances in the search :-) i guess lots of people care here :-) i find your ideas interesting, i simply haven't tried to implement them yet, because my killer scheme works slightly differently than that used by everybody else. but i will try one day... a question related to your move ordering with many killers: how good is your move ordering overall (FH-ratio)? a program which has very good move ordering due to all kinds of tricks won't gain as much with a more clever implementation of killers than a program with practically no move ordering at all. you must certainly be using a hash move, and then what else? -> history? (and what type? from-to or from-to-piece or?) -> SEE or MVV/LVA? -> further static move ordering with PST? -> further move ordering with other tricks? cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.