Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 11:34:47 04/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2004 at 05:34:56, J. Kazinski wrote: >>You've been asked not to mix legal forms of advanced chess with cheating. >>With this mail you've done it again, although it's just in the subject of your >>post. >The subject was well defined as explained. Many will agree with the viewpoint >that rules that cannot be effectively enforced should be avoided. Some even say >that such rules contribute to undermining respect for the rules. The feeling is >that the mark of good rules is effective enforcement. This is a powerful >argument. However, there is another viewpoint I would like to express, namely >that the rules aren't just a set of laws to enforce, but rather the rules of the >game define the game. > >>Obviously that is done to provoke responses on your posts. >What's the problem with that ? It resulted in a nice debate :) > >>Next time, if you want to announce an event, or want to tell us something with >>your post, and want to keep it here: Don't make references to computer >cheating at all. >Server authorities do this all the time. They criminalyze advanced chess >players, it is an assessment, a judgment, all of which exist only in the >mind of the accuser. The word troll was created to describe people like you. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.