Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Testing Chess Programs

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 10:14:21 04/13/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 12, 2004 at 23:07:46, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On April 12, 2004 at 19:51:29, Tom Likens wrote:
>
>>I was thinking about this *exact* problem on the way home from work today.
>>The only solution I could come up with was to add more computers and thus
>>attack the problem in parallel.  I currently have three computers I can
>>dedicate to running various test matches,

You're lucky, Tom.  I only have a single computer for testing, and it is
used for too many other tasks, and I cannot dedicate it to testing only.
:-(

In theory I could also run test matches on my private computer, an old
and slow Macintosh PowerBook.  But unfortunately the PowerBook cannot do
processor-intensive work for a long period of time without running its fan
at the highest level, which makes it sound like a vacuum cleaner.  Besides,
there are not many engines to test against.

>>if I could validate an idea in
>>roughly two days then this problem wouldn't be so bad.  A week, as both you
>>and Tord point out, is difficult.  Adding more CPUs to the problem would
>>make this possible, but it might also turn me into a bachelor again!!
>>
>>As I mentioned previously, testing is my primary focus for the next few weeks.
>>If I come up with anything interesting I'll share it (not being commercial
>>does have a few advantages).  Also don't hesitate to *not* share anything
>>since you make your living at this I can appreciate your position.  If
>>someone asked me to design an integrated circuit for free, I might be
>>reluctant to do so (especially, if it resulted in my not being able to design
>>one for a paycheck in the future).
>>
>>regards,
>>--tom
>
>
>
>I consider that I *do* contribute to computer chess programming. Not by
>providing code, but by providing advices.
>
>I'm not doing what Bob does. Bob provides excellent advices on code, or code
>structure.
>
>I provide more general, or philosophical, advices. They do not cover the same
>areas as advices provided by other people. Some of them took me years to come up
>with, so from my point of view they are valuable, maybe more than code.

Absolutely.  I appreciate your advice at least as much as Bob's, and I try
to read everything you post on this forum.

Tord



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.