Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Diminishing returns

Author: Vasik Rajlich

Date: 01:22:34 04/29/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 29, 2004 at 03:13:07, Tony Werten wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>a while ago we had some discussions about diminishing returns in search for
>chess.
>
>My opinion was that you can't prove that with programs searching d vs d+1 ply
>depth because the advantage of the d+1 program gets smaller. ie at d=1 it has a
>100% depth advantage, at d=2 it's 50% etc.
>
>Some people claimed that you can't compare it that way because bla bla
>exponential something bla :)
>
>Well, I found an easier way to explain it.
>
>A few assumption:
>
>The easiest way to win is when you see a trick, your opponent doesn't see.
>
>The depth that needs to be searched to see a trick is equally divided. ie there
>are as many tricks hidden 1 ply away as there are tricks at 2 ply ( it doesn't
>really matter but it's easier to visualize )
>
>w is player d+1
>b is player d
>
>d=1: b sees tricks 1 ply away, w sees ply 1 and 2 => w sees 2.0x as many tricks
>d=2: b:1,2 w:1,2,3 => w: 1.5x
>d=3: b:1,2,3 w:1,2,3,4 => w: 1.3x
>...
>d=10: b: 1..10 w: 1..11 => w:1.1 x
>
>
>
>Conclusion: There may or may not be diminishing returns in chess, but d vs d+1
>are not going to prove it, because those matches by itself are a clear example
>of diminishing returns regardless what game is played.
>
>disclamer: I know chess isn't only about tricks, but it is an advantage to see
>more of them then your opponent. Clearly the win percentage is depending on
>other (random) stuff as well. BUT When you see less more, the advantage becomes
>less.
>
>Tony

I am willing to accept that diminishing returns are real.

It's the next round of questions which are interesting:

1) Should you let your eval get big (rather than improve it within the
constraints of staying small, which as Junior & Fritz show is very possible)?

2) How different should your selective search be as the hardware changes? Ie. if
you test with 15 minute games on a single-cpu k8, what will this tell you about
40/2 games on a quad k8. Or 40/2 games on a 2006 quad whatever.

Vas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.