Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not hide lengthy threads behind an HTML link?

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 09:20:44 12/15/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 15, 1998 at 03:46:02, Harald Faber wrote:

>On December 14, 1998 at 21:35:32, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>>My main interest is being able to *find* other posts.  It's getting difficult,
>>because if you have the misfortune of posting shortly before a gigantic CM6000
>>thread starts, your post will be "off the screen" in 1-2 hours.
>>
>>Most Usenet news readers solve this problem by "hiding" replies to a thread
>>underneath the thread title.  Free Agent is a good example.  It would be easy to
>>implement the same solution in HTML.  The title of the thread could be a link to
>>a screen which shows all replies to the original post.
>>
>>I like this solution even more than my earlier suggestion of creating subgroups.
>>
>>Any supporters?
>
>No, because in a few days the CM6k-thread will decrease. And then? Delete the
>HTML-link or whatever? No. This is not senseful to create a sub-group or so only
>because there are some mails to one thread than to another.

I think you have misinterpreted my suggestion. I never said anything about
deleting the HTML link.  I am simply looking for a way to make this site more
readable.

Every thread would have a "master link" which points to a subsequent page
containing all posts.  By doing this, the "master page" is much more readable -
a thread would be visible for days instead of hours.

For instance, right now instead of seeing 40 CM6000 posts on the main screen, I
would see 2 links.  Doesn't that make sense?  It is how all modern news readers
operate.

As for the CM6000 treads decreasing, everybody keeps saying that, but I see the
opposite trend - they are increasing steadily.

--Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.