Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:53:14 05/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2004 at 11:49:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I asked for a specific citation for "the JICCA paper" you claimed I wrote and >gave the speedup = 1 + (NCPUS -1) * .7; formula, and also where I claimed it was >good for _any number_ of cpus. > >I know that (a) I didn't write any paper on the Crafty algorithm yet; (b) that YOU DENY THAT YOU WROTE A PAPER PUBLISHED IN ICGA/ICCA ABOUT CRAFTY WHERE YOU CLAIM A 1 + 0.7 (N-1) SPEEDUP? >I have _always_ said that my formula is an approximation that works with up to 8 >processors. it says N for N processors and some posts from you a few years ago indicated it also worked for N=16. >Anything beyond that is your imagination.. >Time to admit it. It has been proven not to be working for n=4 even. >The CCC search engine is available for you to hunt for posts where I claimed >that after you verify there was no JICCA paper whatsoever. >I've called you a liar. >Disprove it or run as you always do... You publish an OFFICIAL paper in the journal of icga and now you claim you didn't write it. It's time to use some of the posts you do here to proof to your government you deny your own papers (about crafty) and commit fraud (in the dts paper) as a professor. >You like to use the "fraud" word. I think it is _obvious_ who is the "fraud" >here... Of course you can prove your statement and make me out the fraud again. > >Your move. Clock is ticking.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.