Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: incremental attack tables?

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 05:38:50 05/05/04

On May 05, 2004 at 08:29:47, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On May 05, 2004 at 07:26:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On May 05, 2004 at 06:52:06, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>>
>>With bitboards perhaps it's slower.
>>
>>Also in endgames with non bitboards it's faster.
>
>It's not a bitboard issue, it's because in the endgame the attack rays are
>generally longer so more bits need updating.
>
>-S.

Knowing Gerd just uses bitboards to get to his goals i guess he was stuck there.

Re: incremental attack tables? Sune Fischer 05:49:01 05/05/04
- Re: incremental attack tables? Vincent Diepeveen 13:23:11 05/05/04
  - Re: incremental attack tables? Sune Fischer 14:15:31 05/05/04
    - Re: incremental attack tables? Vincent Diepeveen 14:26:22 05/05/04
      - Re: incremental attack tables? Sune Fischer 14:57:08 05/05/04
        
        Re: incremental attack tables? Robert Hyatt 15:38:56 05/05/04
        
        Re: incremental attack tables? Sune Fischer 15:59:57 05/05/04
        
        Re: incremental attack tables? martin fierz 05:28:17 05/06/04
        
        Re: incremental attack tables? Anthony Cozzie 17:57:44 05/05/04
        
        Re: incremental attack tables? Dave Gomboc 16:01:39 05/05/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.