Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:01:07 05/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2004 at 12:09:42, Sune Fischer wrote: >On May 11, 2004 at 11:54:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 11, 2004 at 07:39:44, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On May 11, 2004 at 07:17:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On May 10, 2004 at 13:36:24, Sune Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>try to learn some chess instead of trying to comment as a layman onto chess >>>>positions. >>>> >>> >>>With eyes shut eh? >>> >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?364557 >>> >>>-S. >> >> >>Yes. This was tested the wrong way. >> >>You need to take the weakest program you can find and let it play the black >>pieces. Further weaken it by giving it a limited search depth. Take the >>strongest program you can find and give it the white pieces. Play the game. If >>white wins, it proves black was busted and had played poorly up to that point. >> >>Vincent said so... >> >>Isn't it obvious??? >> >>The bad thing is that that is the most scientific test I have ever seen him do. >>:) > >Note the subtle point, if he criticizes Junior for playing bad it will at the >same time weaken his other pet case, namely that of modern top engines should >play a lot better positionally than DB did. > >Quite a pinch. > >-S. "What a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive..." Columbo would go crazy trying to figure out all of his contradictions to solve a case. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.