Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 15:50:21 05/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2004 at 16:51:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I have been getting messages off and on for several weeks about Vincent's >"behind the back" nonsense on ICC. I decided to have Crafty start logging all >the channel 64 stuff to see what's up since I am not on much during the day... > >Here is something I found from over the past few days: > >DIEP(C DM)(64): hi diep getting debugged now >DIEP(C DM)(64): what's up >DIEP(C DM)(64): yeah bob is a fraud >Celes(C)(64): the 'new' stuff in CCC :) >DIEP(C DM)(64): see his article >DIEP(C DM)(64): i can proof it >DIEP(C DM)(64): DTS article >DIEP(C DM)(64): first issue 1997 >DIEP(C DM)(64): and the only thing to convince programmers that his cray blitz >was having what he claims it has >DIEP(C DM)(64): namely the source code >DIEP(C DM)(64): it's gone >kiwiPete(64): You may be able to prove it, in which case you will have a proof. >DIEP(C DM)(64): and he doesn't want to explain to no one how he splitted >kiwiPete(64): :-) >DIEP(C DM)(64): even though it's 5 lines of source code >DIEP(C DM)(64): not to me in 1999 >DIEP(C DM)(64): not to anyone in 2004 either >DIEP(C DM)(64): anyway >DIEP(C DM)(64): it's simple now >DIEP(C DM)(64): i asked for his thesis >DIEP(C DM)(64): i ordered it and paid for it already >DIEP(C DM)(64): if that has the same fraud numbers like 1997 article >DIEP(C DM)(64): then big problems >DIEP(C DM)(64): if it has correct numbers i leave it at that >DIEP(C DM)(64): if his only numbers are the 1997 numbers >DIEP(C DM)(64): note that his 1997 publication is the *only* one he did on DTS >DIEP(C DM)(64): so he has scientifically proven nothing >DIEP(C DM)(64): time will decide now >DIEP(C DM)(64): it's easy >DIEP(C DM)(64): i sit and wait >DIEP(C DM)(64): takes 6 weeks to get delivered >Celes(C)(64): true.. hopefully those big hyatt-diepeveen threads will be gone >then :) >ChessicStudent(64): don't count on it > > >I have a couple of observations. > >(1) He _finally_ discovered how to deal with University Microfilm, to get a >copy of my dissertation. I've been trying to explain that to him for years, but >as we all know, he is a bit on the dense side of things. > >(2) I did my best to explain my "splitting" algorithm to him. But as usual, he >knows that this is "5 lines of code" without ever having seen it. And no, I >won't be telling him anything _new_ about DTS or anything else. He can find out >by himself or do without... I don't cooperate with idiots. > >(3) He will eventually get the copy of my thesis. If I do not see something >written here by him within a reasonable amount of time after that, there _is_ >going to be big trouble. Legal trouble. He's accused me of writing things I >didn't write, and couldn't find the article. He's accused me of producing fake >speedup numbers yet _everybody_ that has run the tests have gotten numbers very >similar to mine. I'm not going to cite all the lies he has told, but I will >make a promise that if he "runs and hides" this time, I'm going to pay someone >to chase him legally. It's about time he learns to grow up and act like a man, >rather than a 6-year-old child... > >As he said above. "Now we wait". But "We won't wait for 4 months this time." > >I'll be watching and waiting and counting the days... After all the discussion generated on this forum by your thesis, I think I'm going to have to buy a copy. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.