Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:11:55 05/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2004 at 19:09:58, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On May 16, 2004 at 18:58:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 16, 2004 at 18:50:21, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>On May 16, 2004 at 16:51:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>I have been getting messages off and on for several weeks about Vincent's >>>>"behind the back" nonsense on ICC. I decided to have Crafty start logging all >>>>the channel 64 stuff to see what's up since I am not on much during the day... >>>> >>>>Here is something I found from over the past few days: >>>> >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): hi diep getting debugged now >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): what's up >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): yeah bob is a fraud >>>>Celes(C)(64): the 'new' stuff in CCC :) >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): see his article >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i can proof it >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): DTS article >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): first issue 1997 >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and the only thing to convince programmers that his cray blitz >>>>was having what he claims it has >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): namely the source code >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's gone >>>>kiwiPete(64): You may be able to prove it, in which case you will have a proof. >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): and he doesn't want to explain to no one how he splitted >>>>kiwiPete(64): :-) >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): even though it's 5 lines of source code >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to me in 1999 >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): not to anyone in 2004 either >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): anyway >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's simple now >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i asked for his thesis >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i ordered it and paid for it already >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if that has the same fraud numbers like 1997 article >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): then big problems >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if it has correct numbers i leave it at that >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): if his only numbers are the 1997 numbers >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): note that his 1997 publication is the *only* one he did on DTS >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): so he has scientifically proven nothing >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): time will decide now >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): it's easy >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): i sit and wait >>>>DIEP(C DM)(64): takes 6 weeks to get delivered >>>>Celes(C)(64): true.. hopefully those big hyatt-diepeveen threads will be gone >>>>then :) >>>>ChessicStudent(64): don't count on it >>>> >>>> >>>>I have a couple of observations. >>>> >>>>(1) He _finally_ discovered how to deal with University Microfilm, to get a >>>>copy of my dissertation. I've been trying to explain that to him for years, but >>>>as we all know, he is a bit on the dense side of things. >>>> >>>>(2) I did my best to explain my "splitting" algorithm to him. But as usual, he >>>>knows that this is "5 lines of code" without ever having seen it. And no, I >>>>won't be telling him anything _new_ about DTS or anything else. He can find out >>>>by himself or do without... I don't cooperate with idiots. >>>> >>>>(3) He will eventually get the copy of my thesis. If I do not see something >>>>written here by him within a reasonable amount of time after that, there _is_ >>>>going to be big trouble. Legal trouble. He's accused me of writing things I >>>>didn't write, and couldn't find the article. He's accused me of producing fake >>>>speedup numbers yet _everybody_ that has run the tests have gotten numbers very >>>>similar to mine. I'm not going to cite all the lies he has told, but I will >>>>make a promise that if he "runs and hides" this time, I'm going to pay someone >>>>to chase him legally. It's about time he learns to grow up and act like a man, >>>>rather than a 6-year-old child... >>>> >>>>As he said above. "Now we wait". But "We won't wait for 4 months this time." >>>> >>>>I'll be watching and waiting and counting the days... >>> >>>After all the discussion generated on this forum by your thesis, I think I'm >>>going to have to buy a copy. >>> >>>anthony >> >> >>Wish someone with some good OCR software would buy a copy, scan it, convert it >>to text, then I could put it up on my web site. The electronic copy of this was >>lost at the same time as the data, all the CB source, all the old crafty >>versions, electronic copies of older papers I had written, etc. >> >>Would be a nice addition, but I can't imagine giving someone a hardcopy I have >>in my office and asking them to type it again. :) > >Why not just scan it and put the scanned images on your website? Not the best >option, but better than nothing... I could probably do that. It's bound so it isn't trivial. But I hate to not have anything electronic. That's why I put the other stuff on my web site. The number of requests were simply beyond "out of control". :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.