Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCC as bad as RGCC

Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin

Date: 17:33:59 12/17/98

Go up one level in this thread


Perhaps I would make a bad moderator, and I do not expect your vote, but I have
not seen nearly the number of 'bad' post that you feel you have seen here.  I
tend to opt on the side of tolaration and/or moderation, in terms of what I
consider to be an 'inappropriate' post in a newsgroup.  As long as people are
not calling other's obscene names, or being anti-semetic, or intentionally
trying to muck up some else's reputation, I try not to get all 'worked up',
about what ever the post is about, even if they are saying some program sucks,
and the guy who say's otherwise is an idiot. (Well, the idiot part would get me
thinking about the private email to the offending party before taking action).

I'm sorry your leaving, and I hope you will reconsider, but otherwise, this is a
newsgroup, a unique one yes, but nevertheless, a newsgroup.  Everybody should
lighten up.


mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict!


On December 17, 1998 at 16:24:32, Dan Kiski wrote:

>I have seen enough posts this last week where people just try again and again to
>put down someone elses honest opinions.
>
>Most people clearly have more interest in getting the last word in than they do
>in what should be the subject data of these posts.
>
>The language used and remarks made, I myself find hard to tolerate. So in much
>the same way I left RGCC, I leave CCC with the one regret being that this is a
>great game and a great subject, if only people could act more like adults.
>
>Some of you will say good go I'm glad and that again is just another example of
>what I find here bad manners.
>C' est le vie
>Dan Kiski.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.