Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:15:08 05/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2004 at 21:45:06, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 22:08:48, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 19:49:57, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:59:18, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:31:13, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:18:39, Russell Reagan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 15:51:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 65 Crafty 18.12/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2483 >>>>>>>Shr7.04 A1200 3.5-43.5 DpFrit8 A1200 3.5-24.5 DpFrit7 A1200 6-38 >>>>>>>Fritz 8 A1200 7.5-37.5 Shred6P A1200 7-36 DpFritz K6450 6.5-33.5 >>>>>>>Junior7 K6450 15-31 Fritz 7 K6-2 9-31 Nimzo 8 K6450 14-26 >>>>>>>Gandalf5 K6-2 10-20 Hiar732 K6450 1-2 Gan432h K6450 22-24 >>>>>>>Fritz532 P200 27.5-18.5 Hiar732 P200X 19-23 Junior5 P200X 5.5-5.5 >>>>>>>Shre3 P200MMX 26.5-13.5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, read the list carefully. It is not a sarcasm. :))))) >>>>>> >>>>>>Read the list MORE carefully. It _is_ sarcasm. >>>>>> >>>>>>* Shredder is running on a 1200 MHz machine >>>>>>* Crafty is running on a 450 MHz machine >>>>>>* It is Shredder 7.04, not Shredder 8 >>>>>>* It is Crafty 18.12, not Crafty 19.13 >>>>>> >>>>>>43.5-3.5 means very little in regards to Shredder 8 vs. Crafty 19.13 on equal >>>>>>hardware. >>>>> >>>>>Well, If the program were other.... How much stronger can be Crafty 19.XXXX over >>>>>Crafty 18.XXXX. The difference must no be very remarkable. What I see is >>>>>Shredder smashing Crafty in this list. >>>>> >>>>>Crafty is not an opponent for Shredder. We can put Shredder 7.04 against Crafty >>>>>19.XXXXX and the result will be the same: Crafty would be smashed again. >>>>> >>>>>I also read the thread carefully and all the proposal is just a clowning. >>>> >>>>You ignore the hardware difference that is very important. >>>>Shredder is stronger than Crafty but 43.5-3.5 result is not realistic and 70% >>>>result with equal hardware is more realistic. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Incredible! That is the second thing of the year that you are right! Fantastic. >>>You are doing a lot of effort! >>> >>>Hurrah for Blass! Finally, he is not writing a lot of nonsense. >> >>Arturo, I hate to break this to you, but you are simply not qualified to get >>into a flame war with Uri. Uri has diligently developed his invincible >>obstinacy with strict training. He has perfected the ruthless arts of >>nitpicking and negativity. There is no shame in retreat; even powerful flame >>warriors fear "Stone Deaf". Patience, young sprout. Your time will come. >> >>http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame78.html >> >>anthony > >There is no problem. One detail. Uri Blass behavior is easy to define: > >1) He posts some question about any technical topic to get the free information. > >2) Two months later when his implementation doesnt function, he say something >negative to create a long polemic and to draw new conclusions. Not correct. > >3) A topic is posted and he begins a lot of irrelevant details of your thing >called Movie or Movei..... such as some famous topic of the wonderful opening >with 1. f3!! ;) Vincent suggested matche that will never happen because he wants money for it. I responded and suggested a match that can happen. The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a relevant topic. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.