Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 19:31:20 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2004 at 12:30:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 28, 2004 at 12:24:50, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On May 28, 2004 at 11:54:47, Michel Langeveld wrote: >> >>>What about this: >>> >>>BabyChess 11.1 - LaMoSca 0.10 [A00] >>>Infinite Loop-2, Rapid, 21st-22nd Ten/b PII 567MHz 128MB (1), 15.09.2002 >>> >>>1.e3 d6 2.Qh5 Nd7 3.Bc4 e5 4.Qxf7# 1-0 >>> >>>LaMoSca 0.10 (1366) - LarsenVB 0.50001 (1904) [A02] >>>Olympic Team Italy - qual Mariano Comense (3.1), 04.08.2003 >>> >>>1.f4 c5 2.c4 Nc6 3.Na3 e6 4.g4 Qh4# 0-1 >>> >>>Tamerlane 0.01 - Sachy 0.2 [A40] >>>Infinite Loop-4, Rapid, 36th-37th Ten/e PII 567MHz 128MB (9), 06.08.2003 >>> >>>1.d4 e6 2.e4 Qh4 3.Qe2 Qxe4 4.Qxe4 Bb4+ White resigns 0-1 >> >>Can you explain why *white* would resign here? It seems like Black is the one >>down a queen with no compensation. > >These programs are not the best programs and they do mistakes. >resigning in a won position is not more surprising than 3...Qxe4 After having done an extensive analysis, I get the feeling Sachy knew about Mr. Tamerlane's weakness.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.