Author: Prakash Das
Date: 18:26:28 12/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 1998 at 20:58:01, Marc Plum wrote: >Well this is understandable, but I doubt if it was really necessary. I had >learned long ago not to bother reading any of his posts. When he was not being >offensive, he was usually just inane, and I didn't have the patience to decipher >his semi-literate style of writing. > >For the record, though, I am not interested in seeing anyone banned, even if I >find them offensive. It is so simple not to click on posts from someone like >Evans once I learn that they have nothing to say. On the other hand, someone >may have been interested in his rantings. If he wasn't using up ridiculous >amounts of bandwidth, why not let him post and just ignore him? > >I expect I will continue to see his name in headers on rgcc. As usual, I just >won't read these messages. No sweat. Actually, CCC was not created to be another r.g.c.c. This is what he doesn't seem to understand. The charter is clear about it: ccc was created to prevent that kind of thing. I am not an oldtimer here, I just read the charter. Even though I too don't prefer banning (most of us ARE sensible compared to Sean Evans), unfortunately if not done so, he will take over this board and turn it into yet another outlet for his idiocy. In the few days he was let back in, read the kind of unrelated threads and the level of rancour he has generated. And he takes this all and dumps it in rgcc. Back and forth the nonsense goes on.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.