Author: James Swafford
Date: 08:57:14 06/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2004 at 11:47:40, James Swafford wrote: >On June 07, 2004 at 11:40:33, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On June 07, 2004 at 11:11:37, Heiner Marxen wrote: >> >>>No. I've used this kind of shifts to assert that the type "int" can contain >>>a certain amount of bits. If the compiler would switch arbitrarily among >>>types, I'd have a problem. C has a system of implicit casts, but it does >>>not apply to this case. >> >>So basically it should always give 0 assuming the native type is 32 bits? > >He's talking about using it as a test to determine what int's native >type is. err... native 'size' is. > >If I want to know if int is bigger than 16 bits, ((1 << 16) == 0) >would tell me. > > >-- >James > >> >>-- >>GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.