Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 17:40:49 06/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2004 at 20:33:57, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 09, 2004 at 20:29:00, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>not quite - you still have the issue of promotions. But I agree with what you >>said elsewhere in this thread that for an internal representation readability >>should not be a primary concern. the only thing I find comfortable to read is >>pure SAN using PNBRQK - the hardest to parse and language dependant. for an >>internal representation I like e2e4 or e7e8=4. > >Ah, forgot about promotions. Good point :-) I'd also be ok if the standard were [optional upper case letter in the language of your choosing]e2e4 if Anthony is just dead set. Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.