Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Different test suite method?

Author: David Dahlem

Date: 12:33:41 06/15/04

One of the problems with the current method of testing engines with test suites
(e.g. WM-Test) is the problem of proving that the proposed solution move is
actually the best move, especially with positions of a positional nature.
Perhaps a new method would avoid this problem, namely a suite of mate positions,
with known, more easily proven solutions? Time to solution could be the criteria
by which engines are evaluated.

Just an idea. Any thoughts? Would this work?

Regards
Dave

Re: Different test suite method? Anthony Cozzie 13:49:38 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 13:56:08 06/15/04
Re: Different test suite method? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 12:54:23 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:00:08 06/15/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? Robert Hyatt 19:38:07 06/19/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 13:44:58 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 14:05:57 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 14:16:14 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 14:29:39 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 14:36:02 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 14:45:49 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 14:57:56 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 15:42:15 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 16:09:52 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? J. Wesley Cleveland 09:57:11 06/16/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 11:19:53 06/16/04
Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 12:45:08 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 12:56:27 06/15/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:01:50 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 13:31:22 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:54:33 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 13:58:17 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:39:30 06/15/04
        
        Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 13:43:22 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? Rolf Tueschen 12:46:36 06/15/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 12:48:15 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? chandler yergin 00:05:14 06/17/04
Re: Different test suite method? Rolf Tueschen 12:42:39 06/15/04
Re: Different test suite method? F. Huber 12:39:26 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:21:07 06/15/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? F. Huber 13:39:02 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 14:25:45 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? Dann Corbit 14:54:34 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 13:42:33 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? Heiner Marxen 13:59:04 06/15/04
- Re: Different test suite method? David Dahlem 12:46:03 06/15/04
  - Re: Different test suite method? F. Huber 13:33:41 06/15/04
    - Re: Different test suite method? Heiner Marxen 13:56:44 06/15/04
      - Re: Different test suite method? F. Huber 14:36:22 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! F. Huber 14:59:13 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! David Dahlem 15:37:14 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! F. Huber 16:02:26 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! Heiner Marxen 16:09:59 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! David Dahlem 16:06:05 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! Dann Corbit 15:16:43 06/15/04
        
        Re: ChestUCI _can_ play chess! F. Huber 15:25:12 06/15/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.