Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 10:50:11 06/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2004 at 10:30:33, martin fierz wrote: >On June 20, 2004 at 02:56:08, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>There is a simple way to verify if the "authors" are correct or not. >> >>They should state clearly how to evaluate all the solutions of the tests >>comparing the hardware to the SSDF one, in order to create the Elo figure. >> >>Then by choosing the next release of 5 commercial programs which will be tested >>by SSDF they have to predict the Elo for ALL 5 chess programs with a + - of 10 >>points. >> >>Than and indipendent tester should run the tests. >> >>If they fail, than they loose. >> >>Sandro > >+-10 elo, you must be kidding! >the SSDF results themselves have larger error margins than that... Yes, but the ratinglists don't list errors and rank programs with smaller differences than 10 ELO. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.