Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 13:14:26 06/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2004 at 15:58:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 21, 2004 at 15:05:32, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On June 21, 2004 at 10:30:33, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>On June 20, 2004 at 02:56:08, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>There is a simple way to verify if the "authors" are correct or not. >>>> >>>>They should state clearly how to evaluate all the solutions of the tests >>>>comparing the hardware to the SSDF one, in order to create the Elo figure. >>>> >>>>Then by choosing the next release of 5 commercial programs which will be tested >>>>by SSDF they have to predict the Elo for ALL 5 chess programs with a + - of 10 >>>>points. >>>> >>>>Than and indipendent tester should run the tests. >>>> >>>>If they fail, than they loose. >>>> >>>>Sandro >>> >>>+-10 elo, you must be kidding! >>>the SSDF results themselves have larger error margins than that... >>> >>>cheers >>> martin >> >>Not at all!! >> >>I did guessed the SSDF rating of Shredder 7 CB, Shredder 7.04 UCI and got very >>close to Shredder 8 CB ( + - 10 points). > >If the rating of shredder against set A of opponents is 2800 and against set B >is 2830 and if you do not know which set the ssdf is going to choose than you >have at least 50% chance to be wrong by more than 10 elo. > >Uri Uri, this would be correct, but I have a way to measure somehow this also. This is how I did... Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.