Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 14:48:47 07/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2004 at 17:32:23, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On July 06, 2004 at 17:22:19, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On July 06, 2004 at 17:10:06, Andrew Dados wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2004 at 16:39:54, Amir Ban wrote: >>> >>>>On July 06, 2004 at 16:24:59, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 06, 2004 at 15:58:24, Ingo Althofer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I just found time to replay the games from round 3. >>>>>> >>>>>>The 27-move win by Junior (with sacrifice of >>>>>>pawns and a full knight) is simply marvellous. >>>>>>And it was not a win by opening-book preparation! >>>>>> >>>>>>Congratulations to Amir and Shay! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Ingo Althofer. >>>>> >>>>>Yes, great game by Junior. However, all the line played by Diep was not good and >>>>>Junior had 4 open columns to attack. The 3 pawns of Diep was not a real >>>>>advantage. If you put other engines from move 13 to 18, you will realize that >>>>>they dont see that the white position is not good. >>>>> >>>>>So, I dont agree that the opening preparation did not influenced the result. It >>>>>helped a lot. Of course, the final Junior was clean and direct. >>>>> >>>>>By the way, just one game. We will see tomorrow.... >>>>> >>>>>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. >>>> >>>>It was just a QGA with slight white advantage. >>>> >>>>Is there anybody else who plays either 18... Rae8 or 20... Bxc5 ? >>>> >>>>Amir >>> >>>While watching the game at playchess I noticed evaluations and plycounts added >>>in movelist for black (Junior). Plycounts suggested there were real Junior >>>numbers from that game - correct me if I am wrong here. >>> >> >>The moves were relayed by Junior, so you are not wrong. >> >> >>>Anyhow if those numbers are from real game then Junior had thought position was >>>better for white till move 22 and thought 0.00 at move 23... Re5 (4 moves prior >>>to white resigning!) >>> >> >>It had given three pawns at that point, so a 0 score is as significant as +3 >>with level material. > >I can't understand ?!?! Do you say that if Junior is 2 Pawns behind and it has >an evaluation of 0.00 then it thinks it has the advantage by +2.00 ? >I thought the evaluations were absolute and a 0.00 is a draw no matter what is >the material difference.... He happy that his kingsafety worked. anthony >> >> >>>IMO it was quite a lucky line for black, resulting in beautiful minature here. >>> >> >>I don't see where luck comes in here. > > No luck at all! I can't understand what luck has to do with Chess. Only the >opening book choice is a factor of luck but in this game there was no advantage >for Junior after the opening. > It was just the well known style of Junior. Please keep working this way. The >style of Junior is amazing. Don't change it.......... > >> >>Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.